https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32889
--- Comment #2 from Bruno Haible ---
Yep. Looks good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32889
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32886
--- Comment #4 from Bruno Haible ---
> The last if statement should be:
> if (cur_instr->addr != 0)
Right. The issue affects _all_ functions (leaf and non-leaf functions), call
instructions and all other instructions alike. Any attempte
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32886
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||x86_64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from B
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32885
Bug ID: 32885
Summary: gprofng --help should state where to report bugs
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32886
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-18
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256
Akhilesh Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32889
Bug ID: 32889
Summary: Typo in documentation
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
As
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32886
--- Comment #2 from Bruno Haible ---
The issue is also visible in the gprofng-gui documentation
https://www.gnu.org/software/gprofng-gui/manual/gprofng.html#The-Disassembly-View
:
0.0. [53] 401d6f: pxor %xmm1,%xmm1
