[Bug gas/32811] nooptimize doesn't apply to immediates

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32811 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #4) > Looks good to me thanks. > > Except should there be an error if the immediate exceeds imm8 or imm16? It is a hint, not a hard requirement. -- You are receiving this

[Bug ld/32666] Incorrect .rela.sframe when using ld -r

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |indu.bhagat at oracle dot com -

[Bug gas/32813] New: Missing REX prefix for LSL

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32813 Bug ID: 32813 Summary: Missing REX prefix for LSL Product: binutils Version: 2.45 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas

[Bug gas/32811] nooptimize doesn't apply to immediates

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32811 --- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen --- Looks good to me thanks. Except should there be an error if the immediate exceeds imm8 or imm16? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32789] sframe: relocatable link of multiple text sections claims FDE to be sorted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32789 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/32789] sframe: relocatable link of multiple text sections claims FDE to be sorted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32789 --- Comment #3 from Indu Bhagat --- (In reply to Jens Remus from comment #1) > I missed to mention that this assumes linker mainline with Indu's "[RFC 0/4] > Fix relocatable links with SFrame section" patch series on top: > https://inbox.sourc

[Bug gas/32811] nooptimize doesn't apply to immediates

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32811 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32789] sframe: relocatable link of multiple text sections claims FDE to be sorted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32789 --- Comment #4 from Indu Bhagat --- >From Weinan's testing so far, it seems 32789 is _not_ affecting arm64 kernel space stack tracer effort https://lore.kernel.org/linux-toolchains/20250214182439.gpavslsvgw4xy7sf@jpoimboe/T/#m66a88cc3eb323b9fd

[Bug ld/32789] sframe: relocatable link of multiple text sections claims FDE to be sorted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32789 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- Right. In the SFrame stack trace format, the FDEs (function descriptor Entry) are in sorted order of the start PC of the functions in the ELF file, if SFRAME_F_FDE_SORTED flag is set. It is true that if th

[Bug ld/32789] sframe: relocatable link of multiple text sections claims FDE to be sorted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32789 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpoimboe at redhat dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/32789] sframe: relocatable link of multiple text sections claims FDE to be sorted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32789 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wnliu at google dot com -- You are rec