https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32408
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |MOVED
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32408
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/399128954
Reference Info: 399128954 binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc
component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuzz
status: New
reporter: 87...@d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32383
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32408
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #11 from Marc ---
(In reply to Toolybird from comment #4)
> Hi, Arch Linux bug wrangler here. I've just rebuilt libadwaita with
> binutils-2.44, installed it on a Gnome desktop.. and don't see any problems
> whatsoever.
>
> I sugg
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #10 from Marc ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> > they are not functional when executed.
>
> Do they crash on startup? Look wrong? Otherwise malfunction (how)? Can you
> give a backtrace if they crash?
I added the st
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #6 from Marc ---
Created attachment 15982
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15982&action=edit
Archive containing build of libadwaita with binutils 2.44
This archive contains a release and a debug build with a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #9 from Marc ---
Created attachment 15983
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15983&action=edit
Stacktrace of the adwaita-demo-1 built with binutils 2.44
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
