https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690
--- Comment #29 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1256b9860f37326c2b4fc2d2ec94be943e86429c
commit 1256b9860f37326c2b4fc2d2ec94be943e86429c
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 15964
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15964&action=edit
A testcase for GCC 10 or above
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 repro]$ make clean
rm -f x *.a *.so a.out *.lto* *.ltrans* *.res
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690
--- Comment #27 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=104443510ad1238d6f30d446bd7070a523d0e9ab
commit 104443510ad1238d6f30d446bd7070a523d0e9a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32700
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31101
--- Comment #4 from Lulu Cai ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #3)
> why not make the test case more robust?
Thank you, we will improve the robustness of the test cases in the future.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32710
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.45 (HEAD)
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603
--- Comment #11 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d26161914cf286171b29767916a212685f9aadf3
commit d26161914cf286171b29767916a212685f9aadf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690
--- Comment #25 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=230a788eb28a64d628e623068c44add2a24aa5d3
commit 230a788eb28a64d628e623068c44add2a24aa5d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690
--- Comment #24 from Sam James ---
If that still works for you, I will try make a Dockerfile or something in the
meantime to reproduce with this, until I can find another testcase?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690
--- Comment #23 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 15963
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15963&action=edit
binutils-32690-src5.tar.xz
(In reply to Sam James from comment #21)
> I can reproduce the link failure. It o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690
--- Comment #22 from Sam James ---
I'm slowly chipping away at it, not forgotten, but this won't be quick.
Is there any chance more asserts could be added (even in just a debugging patch
for me)?
There's only a handful of packages which fail
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/395921930
Changed
access level: Limited visibility → Default access
pe...@google.com added comment #3:
This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32613
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32710
Bug ID: 32710
Summary: Null pointer dereference in libiberty/hashtab.c
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
--- Comment #13 from Claudio Luck ---
My usecase is a 32-bit Kernel with 32K pagesize, running on a 32-bit CPU [1].
But Aarch32-on-Aarch64 with pagesize != 4K is also affected. The linked patches
may make this combination more popular/necessa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at sourceware dot org
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30612
--- Comment #6 from Claudio Luck ---
Your explanation makes perfectly sense: this issue is about Aarch64 binaries,
and my argument about compressed filesystems is definitely limited to native
Aarch32 platforms only.
--
You are receiving this
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/395921930
Changed
status: New → Verified
assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
87...@developer.gs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
--- Comment #11 from Claudio Luck ---
To keep an eye on: "Boot-time page size selection for arm64" [1] [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cdcb663f-afb2-4bc4-a6b9-f7e7896c9...@arm.com/
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/993990/
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31101
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
why not make the test case more robust?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
22 matches
Mail list logo
