[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #11) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > > Please try it on Xen. > > I don't see why I would put time into doing so. As previously indicated, Xen > expects .got to

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

2025-01-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton --- OK, I am baffled. The missing text seems to have nothing to do with function-like invocations either inside or outside here blocks. Could there be two ksh bugs ? -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #11 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > Please try it on Xen. I don't see why I would put time into doing so. As previously indicated, Xen expects .got to be empty. I don't see how that could be achieved

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #9 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > My patch doesn't support fallback which is very intrusive with few benefits. Well, as said in the original report, in the Xen project it's the fallback we'd really ne

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #7) > You say "estimate", and since you exclude linker created sections it looks > like it very much is just an estimate. While for the specific case of Xen > this may be su

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

2025-01-30 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #15 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton --- > Created attachment 15903 > --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15903&action=edit > Another proposed patch Hi Nick, sorry for the delay: I was

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #7 from Jan Beulich --- You say "estimate", and since you exclude linker created sections it looks like it very much is just an estimate. While for the specific case of Xen this may be sufficient (see below though), in the general