[Bug libsframe/32589] function start address is zero in SFrame section dump

2025-01-27 Thread indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589 --- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat --- Currently the section contents are not relocated before textual dump. Hence the value 0. $ readelf -r file.o Relocation section '.rela.sframe' at offset 0x8728 contains 3 entries: Offset Info

[Bug binutils/32542] Fatal error when remotely debugging MIPS32r2 binary with qemu

2025-01-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC|amodra at gmail dot com| -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/32599] [2.44 Regression] objcopy -I ihex: invalid operation

2025-01-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32601] ld on Alpha terminated with double free or corruption (!prev) and signal 6

2025-01-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32601 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- The backtrace isn't all that useful, but it is very likely to be one of the bfd_put_64 calls writing out a got entry. You'll need to find out which one. If I'm correct about it being a got entry, debug unde

Re: a bug for objcopy

2025-01-27 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:53:23PM +0800, Liam Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using manjaro linux and the objcopy version is 2.43.0. > > I met a severe problem when building XV6 for x86. It produced a huge img. > Later I tracked down to the objcopy command. That's the reason. > > *objcopy -S -O bi

[Bug binutils/32599] [2.44 Regression] objcopy -I ihex: invalid operation

2025-01-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599 --- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=102df36d9cd1e611c18ae8e258fa633a4949665e commit 102df36d9cd1e611c18ae8e258

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

2025-01-27 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|ld segv in bfd_set

[Bug ld/32603] New: ld segv in bfd_set_format

2025-01-27 Thread swj22 at mails dot tsinghua.edu.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 Bug ID: 32603 Summary: ld segv in bfd_set_format Product: binutils Version: 2.43 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Ass