https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29259
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32584
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32584
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32584
Bug ID: 32584
Summary: ld.bfd slowdown linking some linux kernels
Product: binutils
Version: 2.39
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Why are we using "$(func)" rather than just plain "func"? Maybe that tickles a
ksh bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Sam James
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3f1585d9c8e809cbdfc725583f361d51f2d50744
commit 3f1585d9c8e809cbdfc725583f3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #6 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=616e6c7fe6ba3a7661d852757f59223416a3
commit 616e6c7fe6ba3a7661d852757f59223416a3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32491
--- Comment #18 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #17)
> Fixed
Thank you!
Just for completeness: I built GCC's releases-gcc14 branch (which doesn't have
the gcc/configure.ac fix) against today's binutils ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
--
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I see one other issue so far (== is not POSIX):
```
--- a/ld/scripttempl/elf.sc
+++ b/ld/scripttempl/elf.sc
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ emit_large_bss()
return
fi
- if test "$1" == "0"; then
+ if test "$1"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
>
> Hmm, there seems to be some inconsistency here. If
> $(align_to_default_symbol_alignment) does not work inside a cat < block then why do $(align_to_default_section_alignment) or $(emit_large_bss
> 0) o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32467
--- Comment #8 from 孙文举 ---
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I must apologize for not
thoroughly reviewing the SECURITY.txt document before proceeding. I now
understand that bugs in inspection tools, such as nm, are not considered
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32467
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to 孙文举 from comment #6)
> CVE-2024-57360 assigned
Note - the binutils/SECURITY.txt document makes it clear that bugs in
inspection tools (such as nm) are not considered to be security issues and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clif
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579
--- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Jan Beulich
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4aa7c2f11182ba7f9102e3d6205992f23cf64233
commit 4aa7c2f11182ba7f9102e3d62
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579
--- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c80eb5cbe7d32bcd9fbdb89f34b5882e64408173
commit c80eb5cbe7d32bcd9fbdb89f34b5882e6440817
17 matches
Mail list logo
