https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32544
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32544
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Please wait. gas may be miscompiled. I need to check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
.LFE0:
.size main, .-main
.ident "GCC: (Gentoo Hardened 15.0. p, commit
93975113f3b353a27dea263c60ee62b27894be9b) 15.0.0 20250110 (experimental)
9193641d1695293006ed0b818bb4161a1b6fbed2"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
```
```
$ /tmp/bi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32544
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are re
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/388571287
Changed
Disclosure: → Apr 9, 2025
___
Reference Info: 388571287 binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Abrt in
riscv_disassembl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #31 from Jan Beulich ---
Generally these have their file alignment inferred from section alignment as
well. Since they're internally generated, we don't have to "fear" huge
alignment. Hence why I had aimed at leaving their handling
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #30 from Masahiro Yamada ---
How is the file offset determined for sections such as .symtab, .rel.*, .rela.*
etc.?
I believe these sections still get some alignment because host tools parse
them, but the alignment requirements on
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/42526920
Changed
status: New → Verified
assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
87...@developer.gse
