https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32085
--- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8520cebeb576ae345ae506f2d7207668cc68d1cb
commit 8520cebeb576ae345ae506f2d7207668
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32499
Palmer Dabbelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32528
Bug ID: 32528
Summary: Different codegen between `mov al, byte [rdi]` and
`mov al, [rdi]`
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32528
Lzu Tao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||taolzu at gmail dot com
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31889
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31888
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|ld
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324
--- Comment #6 from Andre Vieira ---
Scrap that, probably best not to backport.
Oh and thank you Alan!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324
Andre Vieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #29 from Jan Beulich ---
As I'm unable to repro this myself (issue doesn't surface on x86 hardware), can
someone who is able to please give
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-January/138412.html
a try in a Linux tree
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
For targets where zero is a valid address a linker option to specify an
alternate relocation target for targets within GCed sections might be a
workaround, specifying an address that more likely doesn't c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
13 matches
Mail list logo