https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
Bug ID: 32506
Summary: removed functions showing up in objdump listing and
gdb
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32505
Bug ID: 32505
Summary: Memory leak in objcopy when using --add-gnu-debuglink
option.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32491
--- Comment #9 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Thiago Jung Bauermann from comment #6)
> Maybe the gas change surfaced a latent bug in ld?
It actually surfaced a latent bug in GCC's configure script: the fact that
commit d5cbf916b
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/385993741
Changed
Disclosure: → Mar 27, 2025
___
Reference Info: 385993741 binutils:fuzz_as: Use-of-uninitialized-value in
ma
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/385993741
Reference Info: 385993741 binutils:fuzz_as: Use-of-uninitialized-value in
macro_del_f
component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuzz
status: New
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #19 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #18)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #17)
> > Then such a concern should have been sufficient to block the change.
>
> Well, no, we don't reall
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #18 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #17)
> Then such a concern should have been sufficient to block the change.
Well, no, we don't really want to leave bugs around just to account for bugs
elsewhere. A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Just to mention it: It is hardly possible to test with everything that's
> around. In fact I'm less worried of linkers - they're typically respecting
> the spec quite well. My concern was rather about o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31887
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919
Bug 30919 depends on bug 31886, which changed state.
Bug 31886 Summary: gas allows incorrect memory size directive for some x86
opcodes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886
What|Removed |Add
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31885
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #16 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
> Ouch. What was the purpose of this change? Changing such an old behavior
> for no clear benefits beyond saving a few bytes looks rather questionable.
> Was
13 matches
Mail list logo