[Bug ld/31100] [2.42 Regression] pr18841 test failures on riscv64-linux-gnu

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31100 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15858 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15858&action=edit pr31100.sh $ gcc --version | head -1 ; ld --version | head -1 gcc (Gentoo Hardened 15.0. p, commit 01d33f

[Bug ld/18841] Data relocations with IFUNC symbols can lead to segfault

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18841 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/31100] [2.42 Regression] pr18841 test failures on riscv64-linux-gnu

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31100 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/31398] pr21964-4 fails on RISC-V with a default-pie compiler

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31398 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-12-25 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/21964] __start_SCN symbols aren't exported anymore

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/31398] pr21964-4 fails on RISC-V with a default-pie compiler

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31398 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/31100] [2.42 Regression] pr18841 test failures on riscv64-linux-gnu

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31100 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/31398] pr21964-4 fails on RISC-V with a default-pie compiler

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31398 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/31398] pr21964-4 fails on RISC-V with a default-pie compiler

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31398 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/21964] __start_SCN symbols aren't exported anymore

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug binutils/30596] "/usr/lib6464" in riscv64 search paths

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30596 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug binutils/30919] Assembly Syntax Bugs in GAS

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Can you file these as individual bugs please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/18841] Data relocations with IFUNC symbols can lead to segfault

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18841 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/31100] [2.42 Regression] pr18841 test failures on riscv64-linux-gnu

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31100 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > doko, are you still seeing this? > > I see the following with trunk but not yet investigated: > ``` > 5324:FAIL: Run pr21964-4 > 5345:FAIL: Run pr18841 with libpr1884

[Bug ld/31100] [2.42 Regression] pr18841 test failures on riscv64-linux-gnu

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31100 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug gas/32391] \@ incorrectly handled in nested macros

2024-12-24 Thread vvinayag at arm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com ---

Issue 385406651: binutils:fuzz_as: Index-out-of-bounds in do_scrub_chars

2024-12-24 Thread buganizer-system
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/385406651 Reference Info: 385406651 binutils:fuzz_as: Index-out-of-bounds in do_scrub_chars component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuzz status: New rep

[Bug gas/32435] [2.44 Regression] gas produces unaligned sections on arm-linux-gnueabihf for kernel build

2024-12-24 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435 --- Comment #13 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12) > > I'm afraid there's no concept of "aligning" within the (object) file. Yet > > still I was thinking of exactly such (generally speaking wrong) a

[Bug gas/32435] [2.44 Regression] gas produces unaligned sections on arm-linux-gnueabihf for kernel build

2024-12-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- > I'm afraid there's no concept of "aligning" within the (object) file. Yet > still I was thinking of exactly such (generally speaking wrong) assumptions, > making me add the post-commit-message RFC remar

[Bug gas/32435] [2.44 Regression] gas produces unaligned sections on arm-linux-gnueabihf for kernel build

2024-12-24 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435 --- Comment #11 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #10) > > It doesn't need to be Arm32-specific ones. Such a .rodata -> .rodata.str.* > > conversion looks pretty generic. Just that I'm unaware of anything along > > t

Re: Issue 42536662: binutils:fuzz_as: Use-of-uninitialized-value in output_insn

2024-12-24 Thread buganizer-system
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/42536662 Changed status: New → Verified assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com 87...@developer.gse

[Bug gas/32391] \@ incorrectly handled in nested macros

2024-12-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391 --- Comment #13 from Sam James --- The commit has also caused several regressions (likely the same root cause though): PR32484, PR32486, PR32487. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32391] \@ incorrectly handled in nested macros

2024-12-24 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391 Jan Beulich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|