https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
Stas Sergeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |MOVED
--- Comment #10 from Stas Sergee
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
Stas Sergeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|MOVED |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Stas Sergeev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
--- Comment #7 from Stas Sergeev ---
Created attachment 15851
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15851&action=edit
my libs
It is a fedora linker indeed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #4)
> Created attachment 15850 [details]
> my ld.bfd
>
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > Which linker were you using? I tried, ld, lld, gold and mold. All worke
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
--- Comment #4 from Stas Sergeev ---
Created attachment 15850
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15850&action=edit
my ld.bfd
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> Which linker were you using? I tried, ld, lld, gold and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
--- Comment #2 from Stas Sergeev ---
Created attachment 15849
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15849&action=edit
new test case
No custom linker here, no!
Attached it a new test-case.
Now it links libtmp.so from
object f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32461
--- Comment #6 from Stas Sergeev ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #0)
> Created attachment 15841 [details]
> test-case
>
> $ objcopy --only-keep-debug libtmp.so tmp.dbg
> objcopy: tmp.dbg: section `.note.gnu.property' can't be allocated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32460
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32461
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #1 from Jan Beulich ---
Is this object file representative of the problem? There's exactly one anomaly
I'm observing, which is .rodata.str1.4 having an alignment of 4 but not being
4-byte aligned in the file. That shouldn't happen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32467
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32467
--- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5f8987d3999edb26e757115fe87be55787d510b9
commit 5f8987d3999edb26e757115f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32467
--- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c2d41e8a42f1d4c6450feb9c2b7c79afa3f67f4a
commit c2d41e8a42f1d4c6450feb9c2b7c79afa3f67f
18 matches
Mail list logo