[Bug ld/32443] New: ABS symbol value depends on its visibility

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443 Bug ID: 32443 Summary: ABS symbol value depends on its visibility Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug gprofng/32092] gprofng testsuite fails with -flto (ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32092 Bug 32092 depends on bug 32241, which changed state. Bug 32241 Summary: gprofng can't be built with LTO https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32241 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32241 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/32435] [2.44 Regression] gas produces unaligned sections on arm-linux-gnueabihf for kernel build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug gas/32435] [2.44 Regression] gas produces unaligned sections on arm-linux-gnueabihf for kernel build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at suse dot com -- You are

[Bug binutils/32399] buffer overflow printing core_file_failing_command

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32399 --- Comment #4 from xiezhiheng --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2) > Fixed for this particular mach-o testcase, and a few other target cores. Sorry to bother you. Does this problem constitute a security vulnerability? If it is indeed