[Bug binutils/32399] buffer overflow printing core_file_failing_command

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32399 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.44 Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32399] A heap buffer overflow is found in display_bfd of binutils 2.44 (HEAD) in size.c:354

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32399 --- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1e3b2da08eb21042f01a9f6862b487ca77484c92 commit 1e3b2da08eb21042f01a9f6862b487ca77484c92

building of binutils-2.43.1 breaks in several occasions, here's my ugly workaround to get it done.

Hello, bug-binutils, I encountered a couple of problems while building binutils-2.43.1 from the source file distribution but I managed to get the job done with an ugly workaround. First the build stopped at /libibery/filedescriptor.c. The dup2() function gets called but was not declared nor

[Bug gas/32391] \@ incorrectly handled in nested macros

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Regis Duchesne from comment #2) Hi Régis >> I think that this is more of a lack-of-documentation issue than a bug. > > I respectfully disagree, I'll attempt below to argument in favor of my

[Bug gas/32391] \@ incorrectly handled in nested macros

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391 --- Comment #2 from Regis Duchesne --- Hi Nick, thanks for looking at this bug. > I think that this is more of a lack-of-documentation issue than a bug. > Specifically - I would expect \@ to evaluate to the same number anywhere > inside a