[Bug gas/32171] The assembler should report errors for illegal uses of egpr instructions.

2024-09-20 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32171 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/32189] Problem with R_X86_64_GOT64 relocation generation

2024-09-20 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32189 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/32189] Problem with R_X86_64_GOT64 relocation generation

2024-09-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32189 --- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=238493e7f093a64825101b51de037b57a17cf02d commit 238493e7f093a64825101b51de037

[Bug gas/32189] Problem with R_X86_64_GOT64 relocation generation

2024-09-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32189 --- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=68d5dbd315d5e4a1675e430fd9a9553a523f79d3 commit 68d5dbd315d5e4a1675e430fd9a95

[Bug gas/32171] The assembler should report errors for illegal uses of egpr instructions.

2024-09-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32171 --- Comment #6 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d77d08180d195a60193e9b35b6d08036caa55c70 commit d77d08180d195a60193e9b35b6d08

[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

2024-09-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 --- Comment #15 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d774bf9b3623239a1cfa729afcf048a15da657d3 commit d774bf9b3623239a1cfa729afcf048a15da657d3 A

[Bug ld/22393] Add read-only segment

2024-09-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22393 --- Comment #10 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ae6a4c3f1d5caeba962d2c1748a8d2b3bebb1007 commit ae6a4c3f1d5caeba962d2c1748a8d2b3bebb1007 A

[Bug ld/32190] [2.44 Regression] pr22393 test failures

2024-09-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190 --- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ae6a4c3f1d5caeba962d2c1748a8d2b3bebb1007 commit ae6a4c3f1d5caeba962d2c1748a8d2b3bebb1007 Au

[Bug ld/32190] [2.44 Regression] pr22393 test failures

2024-09-20 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) ... > What do you think - are you willing to accept a change to the test itself ? > I will check in this: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-September/13

[Bug ld/32190] [2.44 Regression] pr22393 test failures

2024-09-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. Personally I think that this is a case where the test itself should be changed. Or at least made conditional upon --rosegment not being in effect. Or changed so that it does not complain about