Hi Alex and all:
> But it seems people want to remove it "eventually" ...
> in a couple of centuries ...
Deprecation, in my understanding, requires a realistic
roadmap for change, and in particular there must be
a way to replace any legitimate use of the old facility
by a functionally equivalent
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Nobody said it would be removed soon. But it seems people want to
> remove it "eventually", with that eventually possibly being in a couple
> of centuries, if computers still exist.
>
> But if you have the intention of using it in new software, or
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 04:22:13PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > Nobody said it would be removed soon. But it seems people want to
> > remove it "eventually", with that eventually possibly being in a couple
> > of centuries, if computers still ex
Hi Joachim,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 08:43:33AM +0200, Joachim Wuttke wrote:
> Pages elf(5) and ld.so(8) say that DT_RPATH is deprecated.
The blames are:
commit 28d979c8c7fbdca65e221eca4e21823735f5db8d
Author: Michael Kerrisk
Date: Fri Jul 15 12:06:06 2005 +
Mike Frysinger
tweake
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 66024 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Timeout in
fuzz_objdump_safe
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=66024#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Matthias, is this still a problem? Could you provide steps to reproduce it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jremus at linux dot ibm.com
--
You
