[Bug binutils/31000] objcopy: add support for changing ELF symbol visibility

2024-02-21 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31000 --- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #1) > On the llvm-objcopy side, someone proposes --set-symbol-visibility: > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80872 The proposal looks like: .. option:: --se

[Bug ld/25589] LTO parallel build fails with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find .lto.o: No such file or directory"

2024-02-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25589 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2024-02-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/25784] [ld] Reject addresses outside [0,2**32) for ELFCLASS32

2024-02-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25784 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/25878] Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

2024-02-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25878 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug ld/26268] --gc-sections -u __start_cident inconsistent for -r and non-relocatable links

2024-02-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26268 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/26358] --wrap: the special rule for "undefined symbol" is incompatible with -flto or relocatable links

2024-02-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26358 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/26518] [2.35|regression|bisected] DWARF error: could not find variable specification

2024-02-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26518 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

bug-binutils@gnu.org

2024-02-21 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- Thank you for the feedback. I'm sorry you ran into this. Technically, this is not a bug and this is why I have lowered the priority to P3. I have also labeled this as an enhancement, because it is a d

bug-binutils@gnu.org

2024-02-21 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-21 Status|UNCO

bug-binutils@gnu.org

2024-02-21 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|P2

[Bug binutils/29785] memory bloat in version 2.39

2024-02-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29785 --- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f96127310144d360eac93444c1b6efe80497d163 commit f96127310144d360eac93444c1b6efe80497d163