[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options

2024-01-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 --- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=eb12b17047e25eac70ba32b79144216e86d3baa4 commit eb12b17047e25eac70ba32b79144216e86d3baa4 Au

[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options

2024-01-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 --- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=624c610dd46ed441c349f4bd889f3416cf867fd5 commit 624c610dd46ed441c349f4bd889f3416cf867fd5 Au

[Bug binutils/31250] Stripping Rust static libraries fails because of overly zealous illegal path check

2024-01-25 Thread amy at amyspark dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250 --- Comment #5 from Amyspark --- > Is the library really valid if it contains absolute pathnames ? Yes, all that MSVC cares about is a) the symbol b) the path inside the .lib pointing to an existing object. I was able to extract all of them

[Bug binutils/31250] Stripping Rust static libraries fails because of overly zealous illegal path check

2024-01-25 Thread amy at amyspark dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250 --- Comment #4 from Amyspark --- Applied the patch on top of mingw-w64-binutils (commit c2aee7d89488d9402315d59d25852dff258c9eba), and can confirm it works as expected. Only nit I could propose is to keep track of those files that have been b

[Bug ld/31277] building binutils targeting x86_64-linux-gnu on s390x-linux-gnu doesn't enable i686-linux-gnu

2024-01-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/31250] Stripping Rust static libraries fails because of overly zealous illegal path check

2024-01-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug binutils/31250] Stripping Rust static libraries fails because of overly zealous illegal path check

2024-01-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15332 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15332&action=edit Proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options

2024-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.43 Status|NEW

[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options

2024-01-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 --- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3eb33b8875a032678c375a76f689f928f57dfb15 commit 3eb33b8875a032678c375a76f689f928f57dfb15 Au

[Bug binutils/31283] windmc (s390x) fails with: parser: syntax error

2024-01-25 Thread dan at danny dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31283 --- Comment #5 from Dan Horak --- (In reply to Richard Jones from comment #4) > v2: > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/132096.html even better :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

[Bug binutils/31292] New: objcopy: add --prefix-symbols-remove

2024-01-25 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31292 Bug ID: 31292 Summary: objcopy: add --prefix-symbols-remove Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binuti