[Bug binutils/31208] strip with no arguments sometimes breaks ELF alignment requirements

2024-01-08 Thread godlygeek at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31208 --- Comment #4 from Matt Wozniski --- > So how did that load segment get there? I strongly suspect that it's the result of the ELF editing performed by `auditwheel repair`, from https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel - though I haven't dug in to

[Bug ld/31216] On aarch64 several sections are unnecessarily mapped to segment with executable rights

2024-01-08 Thread marcin.godlewski at onet dot pl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31216 --- Comment #5 from Marcin Godlewski --- Clear, thank you for the explanation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/31047] relocation R_X86_64_NONE against absolute symbol `__dtrace_test_prov___place' in section `.text.startup' is disallowed

2024-01-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31047 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Is it possible to create a testcase? A binary object is OK. If R_386_NONE is also impacted, please also provide such a testcase. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/31047] relocation R_X86_64_NONE against absolute symbol `__dtrace_test_prov___place' in section `.text.startup' is disallowed

2024-01-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31047 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-08 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/31216] On aarch64 several sections are unnecessarily mapped to segment with executable rights

2024-01-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31216 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/31216] On aarch64 several sections are unnecessarily mapped to segment with executable rights

2024-01-08 Thread marcin.godlewski at onet dot pl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31216 --- Comment #3 from Marcin Godlewski --- Or is it GNU ld build time configuration parameter and the issue should be addressed to debian/ubuntu GNU ld maintainers? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.