[Bug binutils/31161] potential Memory in stabs.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31161 --- Comment #4 from 时宇羽然 --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2) > To be clear, by accessible I mean reachable from a pointer in data (possibly > via a chain of pointers). I'm sorry, it seems that the previous attachment may not have bee

[Bug binutils/31161] potential Memory in stabs.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31161 --- Comment #3 from 时宇羽然 --- Created attachment 15259 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15259&action=edit Memory Leak in stabs.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/31158] ld: Should --gc-sections respect RHS of a symbol assignment?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #0) > Perhaps gold and lld's behavior make more sense? No. There is no use of x or bar in your testcase. If you change it to cat > a.s < a.t ld.bfd --gc-sections a.o a

[Bug ld/31145] potential memory leak in binutils/ld

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31145 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug binutils/31161] potential Memory in stabs.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31161 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- To be clear, by accessible I mean reachable from a pointer in data (possibly via a chain of pointers). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/31145] potential memory leak in binutils/ld

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31145 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Last re

[Bug binutils/31161] potential Memory in stabs.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31161 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/31158] ld: Should --gc-sections respect RHS of a symbol assignment?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug binutils/31159] Memory Leak in bucomm.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31159 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/30598] strings crashes when told to search for strings of size 0x40000000 and give special treatment to UTF-8 characters

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30598 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com -- You a

[Bug binutils/30595] strings crashes when told to search for strings of size 0xFFFFFFFF

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30595 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com -- You a

[Bug binutils/31146] potential Memory Leak

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31146 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/31162] New: Memory Leak in ldwrite.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31162 Bug ID: 31162 Summary: Memory Leak in ldwrite.c Product: binutils Version: 2.32 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/31161] New: potential Memory in stabs.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31161 Bug ID: 31161 Summary: potential Memory in stabs.c Product: binutils Version: 2.32 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils