[Bug gold/30867] merge.cc:668:27: error: ‘char16_t’ was not declared in this scope

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Host||x86_64-Linux -- You are rec

[Bug gold/30867] merge.cc:668:27: error: ‘char16_t’ was not declared in this scope

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-none-linux-gnu,

[Bug gold/30867] New: merge.cc:668:27: error: ‘char16_t’ was not declared in this scope

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867 Bug ID: 30867 Summary: merge.cc:668:27: error: ‘char16_t’ was not declared in this scope Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ld/30865] ld: =fillexp different behaviors for hexidecimal literal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15114|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/30865] ld: =fillexp different behaviors for hexidecimal literal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- It is always the way - you post a patch and then immediately realise that you have forgotten something. In this case my patch updates the description of the FILL directive in the linker documentation, but

[Bug ld/30865] ld: =fillexp different behaviors for hexidecimal literal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15114 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15114&action=edit Proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30865] ld: =fillexp different behaviors for hexidecimal literal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #0) > A side effect possibly from this commit is that 0x literals have different > behaviors from decimal literals and expressions. > > .text : { *(.text) } =0x90

[Bug ld/30824] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.41 internal error, aborting at elf64-ppc.c:17531 in ppc64_elf_relocate_section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30824 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/30865] ld: =fillexp different behaviors for hexidecimal literal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com

[Bug gas/30856] Regression: operand size mismatch for `push'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856 --- Comment #2 from Antoni Boucher --- Created attachment 15113 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15113&action=edit ASM reproducer for the bug Here it is. You simply need to run GNU as on this file to trigger the error.

[Bug gas/30860] Possible usage of NULL in GAS

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30860 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug gas/30857] Use of uninitialized memory

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30857 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gas/30856] Regression: operand size mismatch for `push'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1