[Bug binutils/30781] New: Ranges section dump is broken if both ranges and rnglists sections are present

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30781 Bug ID: 30781 Summary: Ranges section dump is broken if both ranges and rnglists sections are present Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/30758] ODR violations in opcodes dir

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/30758] ODR violations in opcodes dir

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758 --- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries --- I've submitted a workaround for gdb, using this approach: ... #define cgen_operand_type _cgen_operand_type #define cgen_hw_type _cgen_hw_type #include "opcodes/-desc.h" ... -- You are rec

[Bug gprofng/30779] gprofng: fails to build with musl-1.2.4 (gprofng/src/Data_window.h:56:3: error: 'off64_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'off_t'?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Downstream report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/912284 Full build log (xz compressed): https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=867845 I can give more information if needed. -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug gprofng/30779] New: gprofng: fails to build with musl-1.2.4 (gprofng/src/Data_window.h:56:3: error: 'off64_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'off_t'?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779 Bug ID: 30779 Summary: gprofng: fails to build with musl-1.2.4 (gprofng/src/Data_window.h:56:3: error: 'off64_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'off_t'?) Product: bin

[Bug binutils/28387] ld: Move R_*_TLSDESC to .rela.dyn

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28387 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi