https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30724
--- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f82ee0c8dc4ee32556e23e6cd83ef083618f704f
commit f82ee0c8dc4ee32556e23e6cd83e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Let's leave things as they are for the moment. I will test hppa64 builds on
linux and hpux.
I started hacking on glibc to support hppa64-linux but got waylaid.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #7)
> On 2023-08-08 3:33 p.m., sam at gentoo dot org wrote:
> > Thanks Dave, I've done that last night in
> > https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/871qgdto5m@gentoo.o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-08-08 3:33 p.m., sam at gentoo dot org wrote:
> Thanks Dave, I've done that last night in
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/871qgdto5m@gentoo.org/T/#m0f16fd340d16e17949f21533
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-08-08 3:33 p.m., sam at gentoo dot org wrote:
> Let me check if I can repeoduce the ELF weak (alias) failure.
The segv appears to be in printf.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #4)
> Created attachment 15051 [details]
> ld-hppa.d
>
> On 2023-08-08 12:16 p.m., danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > I see for GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808:
amodra at gmail dot com writes:
>> is that on Git somewhere? I can run a tests with it
>> the upcoming weekend most likely.
> No, the patch is not upstream anywhere yet, I'll wait for someone to test it
> on
> cygwin before committing. It applies with "git am" to either binutils master
> or binu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-08-08 12:16 p.m., danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I see for GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808:
> XFAIL: relocatable with script
> UNSUPPORTED: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a
The xfail and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.42
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.42
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e3b66187192ce6840df283c00f6395bb0ff15cf5
commit e3b66187192ce6840df283c00f6395
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0e339f6b4f2df25ed351cb94dc7fe16868626f49
commit 0e339f6b4f2df25ed351cb94dc7fe1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
I see for GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808:
XFAIL: relocatable with script
UNSUPPORTED: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a
PASS: ELF weak (alias)
Is the segmentation fault in the ELF weak test reproducible?
--
17 matches
Mail list logo