Issue 57055 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc

Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 57055 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=57055#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted within 7 da

[Bug binutils/30508] warning: empty loadable segment detected at vaddr=0x400000, is this intentional?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30508 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3c5e824b9cee93a987a77906240c509add260a0d commit 3c5e824b9cee93a987a77906240c509a

[Bug binutils/30513] nm-new hangs infinitly on a special test case.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30513 --- Comment #2 from 孙文举 --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > This is a problem demangling the rust symbol _RYODGYODGpe__RYODGpe. > Please report rust demangler bugs to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ okey! thx for reply! I report the

[Bug binutils/30508] warning: empty loadable segment detected at vaddr=0x400000, is this intentional?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30508 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/30508] warning: empty loadable segment detected at vaddr=0x400000, is this intentional?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30508 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3f60b98298fd77dec3a9182797c9dd6d7796bcaf commit 3f60b98298fd77dec3a9182797c9dd6d

[Bug ld/30374] ld: Add --remap-inputs-file= to remap input files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30374 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com Assi

[Bug binutils/30237] strip fails on riscv with 'not enough room for program headers, stgnjAlO[.interp]: bad value'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30237 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- llvm-strip is quite broken: it fails to update the RISCV_ATTRIBUTES segment when .riscv.attributes is removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/30513] nm-new hangs infinitly on a special test case.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30513 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/30499] reword "alignment ... is smaller than alignment ..." warning

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30499 --- Comment #4 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #2) > > Hmm, on reflection this proposed message might not actually be correct. > > Generally one can't just increase the

[Bug binutils/30513] New: nm-new hangs infinitly on a special test case.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30513 Bug ID: 30513 Summary: nm-new hangs infinitly on a special test case. Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compo

[Bug ld/30499] reword "alignment ... is smaller than alignment ..." warning

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30499 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug binutils/30512] New: objdump 2.40 for risc-v doesn't have "addi" instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30512 Bug ID: 30512 Summary: objdump 2.40 for risc-v doesn't have "addi" instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal