[Bug gas/30092] Build failed due to directory gas/doc was not created

2023-02-06 Thread robinlee.sysu at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30092 --- Comment #4 from Robin Lee --- '.dirstamp' was created under 'gas/doc' in the source directory instead of build directory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/30092] Build failed due to directory gas/doc was not created

2023-02-06 Thread robinlee.sysu at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30092 --- Comment #3 from Robin Lee --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2) > I cannot reproduce this problem. The dependency %D%/$(am__dirstamp) ought > to cause the doc dir to be created via a rule in gas/Makefile. This one: > > doc/$(am__

[Bug gas/30092] Build failed due to directory gas/doc was not created

2023-02-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30092 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- I cannot reproduce this problem. The dependency %D%/$(am__dirstamp) ought to cause the doc dir to be created via a rule in gas/Makefile. This one: doc/$(am__dirstamp): @$(MKDIR_P) doc @: >

[Bug gas/30092] Build failed due to directory gas/doc was not created

2023-02-06 Thread robinlee.sysu at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30092 --- Comment #1 from Robin Lee --- Created attachment 14655 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14655&action=edit error build log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/30092] New: Build failed due to directory gas/doc was not created

2023-02-06 Thread robinlee.sysu at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30092 Bug ID: 30092 Summary: Build failed due to directory gas/doc was not created Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug ld/26119] ld: Support --reproduce

2023-02-06 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26119 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #

[Bug ld/30091] Bundle all artifacts and command line invocation to quickly reproduce linker errors

2023-02-06 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/30091] Bundle all artifacts and command line invocation to quickly reproduce linker errors

2023-02-06 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/30091] New: Bundle all artifacts and command line invocation to quickly reproduce linker errors

2023-02-06 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091 Bug ID: 30091 Summary: Bundle all artifacts and command line invocation to quickly reproduce linker errors Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice

2023-02-06 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080 --- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey --- Thanks Nick. That looks good to me. I also wonder if that could ever happen. Maybe it's possible for some format but not ELF? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/30089] New: [display text] Incorrect thread count shown on aarch64

2023-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30089 Bug ID: 30089 Summary: [display text] Incorrect thread count shown on aarch64 Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

[Bug gprofng/30089] [display text] Incorrect thread count shown on aarch64

2023-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30089 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/30088] [collect app] CPU frequency is inadvertently printed in the help output on aarch64

2023-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30088 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Severity|minor

[Bug gprofng/30088] New: [collect app] CPU frequency is inadvertently printed in the help output on aarch64

2023-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30088 Bug ID: 30088 Summary: [collect app] CPU frequency is inadvertently printed in the help output on aarch64 Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: NEW Severit

Issue 53418 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_strings: Out-of-memory in fuzz_strings

2023-02-06 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 53418 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_strings: Out-of-memory in fuzz_strings https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=53418#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted

[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice

2023-02-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-06 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #22 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #21) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #20) > > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18) > > > Created attachment 14652 [details] > > > Proposed patch > > > > > > Inte

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-06 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #23 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #22) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #21) > > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #20) > > > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18) > > > > Created attachment 14652