https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30036
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Mezentsev
---
I cannot reproduce the problem on my machines.
My gcc on aarch64 doesn't generate the 32-bit binaries:
% gcc x.c -m32
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-m32’
How do you configure your bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30078
Bug ID: 30078
Summary: FAIL: merge4
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassig
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #19 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18)
> Created attachment 14652 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Interesting. The issue is the section itself: .rdata_r. This is not a
> normal PE section name, and it i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #18 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 14652
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14652&action=edit
Proposed patch
Interesting. The issue is the section itself: .rdata_r. This is not a normal
PE section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at sou
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 55611 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_nm: Null-dereference
READ in ecoff_swap_ext_in
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=55611#c3
This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public.
- Your friendly Sheriffb
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 55587 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_nm: Heap-buffer-overflow
in ecoff_swap_ext_in
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=55587#c3
This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public.
- Your friendly Sheriffbo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006
--- Comment #17 from Satadru Pramanik ---
The build also succeeds for me when I force the use of bfd.
So the build of gprofng is broken on i686 only with gold linker?
Can that be fixed? It's certainly a regression...
--
You are receiving t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30076
Bug ID: 30076
Summary: aarch64: stubs can add indirect branch that breaks BTI
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compon
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at redhat dot com|
--
You are receiving this ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--
You are receiv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30069
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-02-03
Status|UNCONFIR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30069
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 14651
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14651&action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30069
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Habacker ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
Hi Nick,
thanks for investigating.
> Given that the symbols can be demangled via the command line that you use
> in the description, it seems to me that fixin
14 matches
Mail list logo