[Bug libsframe/30014] FTBFS: install-strip fails because bfdlib relinks and fails to find libsframe

2023-01-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30014 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_40-branch branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bcea253f5fa194e57f9564e8461c718e228bd26e commit bcea253f5fa194

[Bug libsframe/30014] FTBFS: install-strip fails because bfdlib relinks and fails to find libsframe

2023-01-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30014 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b8d21eb0cd10d6127e77cc437d82e949adb0c454 commit b8d21eb0cd10d6127e77cc437d82

[Bug libsframe/30014] FTBFS: install-strip fails because bfdlib relinks and fails to find libsframe

2023-01-18 Thread indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30014 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/30022] concurrent builds can fail

2023-01-18 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30022 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug gprofng/29987] bfd/archive.c:1447: undefined reference to `filename_ncmp'

2023-01-18 Thread jbg...@lug-owl.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987 --- Comment #7 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Build is currently restored by reverting the initial patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Issue 55037 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Null-dereference READ in strcasecmp

2023-01-18 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 55037 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Null-dereference READ in strcasecmp https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=55037#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot --

[Bug binutils/30022] New: concurrent builds can fail

2023-01-18 Thread vincent.vsmeets at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30022 Bug ID: 30022 Summary: concurrent builds can fail Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/30022] concurrent builds can fail

2023-01-18 Thread vincent.vsmeets at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30022 Vincent Smeets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincent.vsmeets at gmail dot com --

[Bug ld/29998] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] under mingw with LTO

2023-01-18 Thread medhefgo at web dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29998 --- Comment #10 from Jan Janssen --- > So possibly s->output_section is not a valid pointer ? Mind you this does > seem unlikely as that very same indirection has been used in several places > before line 1538. To be honest though, I have

[Bug binutils/29993] objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes

2023-01-18 Thread fche at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993 --- Comment #9 from Frank Ch. Eigler --- > Yes - I am afraid that the watermark protocol document is a bit out of date, > and its rules for note merging do need to be updated. I'd suggest not over-specifying merging, or specifying merging per

[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

2023-01-18 Thread kurt.goebel at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 Kurt Goebel changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug ld/26236] ld on sparc produces R_SPARC_NONE relocations

2023-01-18 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26236 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://sourceware.org/bugz | |illa/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug ld/29998] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] under mingw with LTO

2023-01-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29998 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Jan, Dang - I still cannot reproduce this problem. The issue now is that I have the wrong version of the compiler installed on my system (an x86_64 box running Fedora 36): lto1: fatal error: bytecod

[Bug binutils/29993] objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes

2023-01-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=94e76498c3790d90c383621b88268abf9acdd5bf commit 94e76498c3790d90c383621b882