[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

2023-01-12 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Could this be addressed in time for .40 if possible please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29991] gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives

2023-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/29994] ld fails to generate NOTE segment (with Build ID) on aarch64 if -z execstack or -z noexecstack

2023-01-12 Thread ndesaulniers at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29994 Nick Desaulniers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndesaulniers at google dot com --

[Bug binutils/29993] objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes

2023-01-12 Thread wcohen at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993 --- Comment #2 from William Cohen --- I believe the large number of notes is because of the use of static libraries in the packages. Took a look at how the some of the shared libraries were generated in the mesa package which has a similar but

[Bug ld/29994] New: ld fails to generate NOTE segment (with Build ID) on aarch64 if -z execstack or -z noexecstack

2023-01-12 Thread tom.saeger at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29994 Bug ID: 29994 Summary: ld fails to generate NOTE segment (with Build ID) on aarch64 if -z execstack or -z noexecstack Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug binutils/29993] objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes

2023-01-12 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at klomp dot org -- You are rec

[Bug binutils/29993] objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes

2023-01-12 Thread wcohen at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993 William Cohen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wcohen at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/29993] New: objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes

2023-01-12 Thread fche at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993 Bug ID: 29993 Summary: objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

2023-01-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #27) > Created attachment 14577 [details] > Augmented patch, incorporating review comments expected_tls_le should be unsigned int. The check will be if (r_type_tls == e

[Bug libctf/29983] 2.36+ type confusion in outdated-input warning causes out-of-bounds access and possible overwrite

2023-01-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_40-branch branch has been updated by Nick Alcock : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=999e7ed7a2bfd3a65468b383222d441a8071d8e4 commit 999e7ed7a2bfd3

[Bug libctf/29983] 2.36+ type confusion in outdated-input warning causes out-of-bounds access and possible overwrite

2023-01-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Alcock : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c777aa9765b6892c1ef7d7584385b9377071248e commit c777aa9765b6892c1ef7d7584385

[Bug gas/29990] gas: micromips flag mistakenly erased after align directive

2023-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/29991] gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives

2023-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 29990 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/11516] Fatal error assembling jsr for Alpha ECOFF

2023-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---

[Bug gas/29991] gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 --- Comment #1 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14585 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14585&action=edit test code:align-after-label.s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29991] New: gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 Bug ID: 29991 Summary: gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gas/29991] gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 刘鑫 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com -- You are re

[Bug gas/29991] gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 --- Comment #2 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14586 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14586&action=edit testcase1:mips-align-after-label.d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29991] gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 --- Comment #3 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14587 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14587&action=edit testcase2:micromips-align-after-label.d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29990] gas: micromips flag mistakenly erased after align directive

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 --- Comment #5 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14581 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14581&action=edit tescase2:micromips-align-after-label.d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29990] gas: micromips flag mistakenly erased after align directive

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 --- Comment #6 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14582 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14582&action=edit this is the patch file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29990] gas: micromips flag mistakenly erased after align directive

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 --- Comment #3 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14579 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14579&action=edit test code:align-after-label.s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29990] gas: micromips flag mistakenly erased after align directive

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 --- Comment #7 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14583 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14583&action=edit this is the patch file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29990] gas: micromips flag mistakenly erased after align directive

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 刘鑫 changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gas: mistakenly mark|gas: micromips flag |micromips

[Bug gas/29990] gas: micromips flag mistakenly erased after align directive

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 --- Comment #4 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14580 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14580&action=edit tescase1:mips-align-after-label.d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29990] gas: micromips flag mistakenly erased after align directive

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 --- Comment #2 from 刘鑫 --- Created attachment 14578 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14578&action=edit this is the patch file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29990] New: gas: mistakenly mark micromips if .align after label

2023-01-12 Thread xin.liu at oss dot cipunited.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990 Bug ID: 29990 Summary: gas: mistakenly mark micromips if .align after label Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2