https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29678
Bug ID: 29678
Summary: Unsupported target for loongrach64-linux-gnu for
linker
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29678
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29678
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||loongarch64-linux-gnu
Host|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29677
2019 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||1d4e62f498b1340569fd58c401f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29677
Bug ID: 29677
Summary: Field `the_bfd` of `asymbol` is uninitialized in
function `bfd_mach_o_get_synthetic_symtab`
Product: binutils
Version: 2.40 (HEAD)
Status: UNCON
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #23 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
I'm currently regtesting the attached patch.
This discussion made me realize that our hotpatching support is currently
broken in a fashion similar to that of Qt5 (details in the patch's commit
message
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29665
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29665
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7fd882d4ad91916fd8a05148117f05ea9f5d756c
commit 7fd882d4ad91916fd8a05148117
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29665
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 14393
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14393&action=edit
Proposed patch
The problem is that the error message is referring to the (temporary) output
file name and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #21 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Rui Ueyama from comment #20)
> GCC 12 seems to always append `@PLT` to a function symbol even if we are not
> calling that function. Here is a test case.
...
> I think `larl %r1,foo@PLT` sh
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #20 from Rui Ueyama ---
GCC 12 seems to always append `@PLT` to a function symbol even if we are not
calling that function. Here is a test case.
```
$ echo 'void foo(); void *bar() { return foo; }' | gcc-12 -S -o- -xc -
.f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29665
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
St
13 matches
Mail list logo
