[Bug binutils/29489] dlltool is not deterministic

2022-08-22 Thread mh-sourceware at glandium dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29489 --- Comment #4 from Mike Hommey --- The patch seems to work as expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29512] ld non-canon ref to canon protected function check breaks Solaris/x86

2022-08-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29512 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- The code in question is struct tm *tb = (kind == CPP_time_kind::FIXED ? gmtime : localtime) (&tt); There is no pointer comparison here. We can ignore protected vis

[Bug binutils/29497] `x86_64-w64-mingw32-dlltool -m i386` doesn't produce a fully i386 importlib

2022-08-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29497 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com St

Issue 47748 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objcopy: Timeout in fuzz_objcopy

2022-08-22 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 47748 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objcopy: Timeout in fuzz_objcopy https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47748#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted withi

[Bug ld/29512] ld non-canon ref to canon protected function check breaks Solaris/x86

2022-08-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29512 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug gas/29494] Trailing jump table leads to "Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment" on ARM thumb

2022-08-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 14287 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14287&action=edit Proposed Patch Hi Angus, Would you mind trying out the uploaded patch ? I think that I have found a

[Bug ld/29512] New: ld non-canon ref to canon protected function check breaks Solaris/x86

2022-08-22 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29512 Bug ID: 29512 Summary: ld non-canon ref to canon protected function check breaks Solaris/x86 Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: NEW Severity: normal