https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29462
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6158b25f77db11712b84e6a4609898f2615ac749
commit 6158b25f77db11712b84e6a460989
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29462
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-10
Status|UNCONFIRME
On 8/9/22 2:44 PM, Ruud van der Pas wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks again for the help with this.
We came up with the following one liner for the list. I've used
the same HTML format as used for the other entries:
gprofng - Collects and displays application performance data.
also we might wan
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465
Ruud van der Pas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465
Ruud van der Pas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |ruud.vanderpas at
oracle do
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29465
Bug ID: 29465
Summary: [display html] File version.texi is created in the
binutils source directory
Product: binutils
Version: 2.39
Status: NEW
Severity: nor
Hi Nick,
Thanks again for the help with this.
We came up with the following one liner for the list. I've used
the same HTML format as used for the other entries:
gprofng - Collects and displays application performance data.
Related to this, we were wondering if we can get a gprofng page on
ht
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 47389 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Out-of-memory
in fuzz_objdump
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47389#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It ha
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 47401 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_windres:
Null-dereference READ in ubsan_GetStackTrace
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47401#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29457
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hi Nick,
> Oh yes - I will be there. :-)
That is great! It will be really nice to meet in person
and I look forward to that :-)
Kind regards, Ruud
Hi Ruud,
By the way, will you be at Cauldron? I plan to attend and would
love to meet in person!
Oh yes - I will be there. :-)
Cheers
Nick
Hi Nick,
Thank you very much for the fast response!
I hope you've enjoyed your vacation.
> Doh! Sorry - this is my bad. I should have thought to ask you.
Hey, no problem at all! Also, you have been really busy getting
2.39 out of the door!!
> Take a slice of lemon, wrap it around a gold bric
Hi Ruud,
Since we are now part of the GNU binutils 2.39 release, I wonder
if gprofng can be added to the list on the main binutils web site:
Doh! Sorry - this is my bad. I should have thought to ask you.
https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
If this is possible, please advise how to proc
Hello!
My name is Ruud van der Pas and I am one of the people involved
with the development of gprofng, the new GNU profiling tool.
Since we are now part of the GNU binutils 2.39 release, I wonder
if gprofng can be added to the list on the main binutils web site:
https://www.gnu.org/software/bin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29457
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a88c79b77036e4778e70d62081c3cfd1044bb8e3
commit a88c79b77036e4778e70d62081c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29451
--- Comment #13 from Jan Beulich ---
See patch at https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-August/122322.html.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29451
--- Comment #12 from Jan Beulich ---
Yeah, I can certainly see my thinko. Making a patch ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29451
--- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #8)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #7)
> > > and the symbol size is also 0 in the table:
> > > $ readelf -s crti.o
> > >
> > > Symbol table '.symtab' conta
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29457
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liska ---
Yes, thanks for it. I've just tested the patch and it looks nice!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29451
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liska ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #9)
> The commit in question actually tries to avoid emitting zero-sized regions,
> so the question is why
>
> if (S_GET_SIZE (symp) == 0)
> {
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29451
--- Comment #9 from Jan Beulich ---
The commit in question actually tries to avoid emitting zero-sized regions, so
the question is why
if (S_GET_SIZE (symp) == 0)
{
if (!IS_ELF || symbol_get_obj (symp)->siz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29451
--- Comment #8 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #7)
> > and the symbol size is also 0 in the table:
> > $ readelf -s crti.o
> >
> > Symbol table '.symtab' contains 11 entries:
> >Num:Value Size Type
23 matches
Mail list logo
