https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
--- Comment #31 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Luca Bacci from comment #30)
> Is it safe to backport this patch to the 2_39 branch?
You can probably answer that question better than I can, by testing the patch.
I am reasonably confident th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=59f214544c50ec7ebbca285ff2b4949f48671690
commit 59f214544c50ec7ebbca285ff2b4949f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17102
Leo Yuriev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leo at yuriev dot ru
--- Comment #1 from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12020
Leo Yuriev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leo at yuriev dot ru
--- Comment #1 from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29410
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_39-branch branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7ca38082b7b66d6604495b47ca253f723a5b7e5c
commit 7ca3808
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29410
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4d44946794e68cf79cfba467fa414a958dba2185
commit 4d44946794e68cf79cfba
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
--- Comment #30 from Luca Bacci ---
Thank you very much, Alan and Nick!
Is it safe to backport this patch to the 2_39 branch? Let me know, otherwise we
can simply add a downstream patch in MSYS2.
Cheers,
Luca
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29410
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liska ---
I likely know how to fix it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442
Bug ID: 29442
Summary: objdump: DWARF error: could not find variable
specification at offset 0x3d3 with dwz
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28813
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28978
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #6 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
--- Comment #28 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a6ad7914429a22d3d835bd998b032212b776a08a
commit a6ad7914429a22d3d835bd998b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21193
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18741
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18401
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17605
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17196
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18064
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17385
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16825
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16821
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
--- Comment #27 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #26)
> I also think that we should keep part of my original patch - the part that
> makes bfd_set_filename() fail if the bfd has been closed by the file cache,
> and wh
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
--- Comment #26 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #25)
Hi Alan,
> What do you think of this one, Nick?
I like it. It is definitely a more robust solution to the original problem.
> It's also possible to stuff the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22549
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
29 matches
Mail list logo