[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

2022-07-13 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- % git log --pretty=format:"%h - %an, %ar --> %s" --graph --name-status * e89f145f92a - GDB Administrator, 3 hours ago --> Automatic date update in version.in| | M bfd/version.h * 8df729f4f96

[Bug binutils/29348] gdb/build: format specifies type 'unsigned long' but the argument has type 'bfd_size_type' (aka 'unsigned long long')

2022-07-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29348 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- The direct cause here is likely a wrong configure setting for BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG. How did you configure and build? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

2022-07-13 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Vla

Re: Number of bfd_count_sections changes during bfd_simple_get_relocated_section_contents

2022-07-13 Thread Alan Modra
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:30:44PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > Hi, > > with gdb we've run into this PR ( > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29295 ) which is due to: > - gdb expecting bfd_count_sections to remain constant, and > - bfd changing the bfd_count_sections from 6 to 7, due

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

2022-07-13 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- 1. About gprofng/autom4te.cache: I just cloned git binutils-gdb % clone https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git binutils-gdb.git % cd binutils-gdb.git % find . -name autom4te.cache -ls There i

[Bug binutils/29348] gdb/build: format specifies type 'unsigned long' but the argument has type 'bfd_size_type' (aka 'unsigned long long')

2022-07-13 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29348 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at sourceware dot org

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

2022-07-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Matthias Klo

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

2022-07-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose --- my last successful build was on 20220707, the only changes in the gprofng subdir is the generated configure file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

2022-07-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose --- building in a separate builddir, configuring with ../configure --with-sysroot=/ \ --libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu \ --disable-silent-rules --enable-obsolete --e

[Bug gprofng/29365] [2.39/2.40 Regression] gprofng fails to build on glibc-2.33

2022-07-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

2022-07-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment #

[Bug gprofng/29365] New: [2.29/2.30 Regression] gprofng fails to build on glibc-2.33

2022-07-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: doko at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- seen with the 2.39 branch 20220713: In file included from ../../../gprofng/src/../../include/demangle.h:32, from

[Bug gprofng/29365] [2.39/2.40 Regression] gprofng fails to build on glibc-2.33

2022-07-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[2.29/2.30 Regression] |[2.39/2.40 Regression]

[Bug gprofng/29364] New: libgprofng.so: needs to link against -pthread

2022-07-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29364 Bug ID: 29364 Summary: libgprofng.so: needs to link against -pthread Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Componen