[Bug gprofng/29338] Declaration conflict for basename

2022-07-11 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I cannot reproduce the problem. I see in my builds that HAVE_DECL_BASENAME is always defined: % grep HAVE_DECL_BASENAME BLD/gprofng/config.h #define HAVE_DECL_BASENAME 1 We use AC_CHECK_DECLS([base

[Bug ld/29355] ld segfaults with -r/-q and custom-named section .rela*

2022-07-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29355 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ld/29355] ld segfaults with -r/-q and custom-named section .rela*

2022-07-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29355 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_39-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=23b1320eb51e6c52608074526bc9833ffa4129ec commit 23b1320eb51e6c5

[Bug ld/29355] ld segfaults with -r/-q and custom-named section .rela*

2022-07-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29355 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=35c5dcc666082f0edf6dd559e46b98d0e7986a2e commit 35c5dcc666082f0edf6dd559e46b9

[Bug ld/29355] ld segfaults with -r/-q and custom-named section .rela*

2022-07-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29355 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gprofng/29356] [display html] Execution fails if gprofng is not included in PATH

2022-07-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kurt.goebel at oracle dot com,

[Bug gprofng/29356] [display html] Execution fails if gprofng is not included in PATH

2022-07-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gprofng/29356] [display html] Execution fails if gprofng is not included in PATH

2022-07-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle do

[Bug gprofng/29356] New: [display html] Execution fails if gprofng is not included in PATH

2022-07-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356 Bug ID: 29356 Summary: [display html] Execution fails if gprofng is not included in PATH Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug gprofng/29015] On Intel Skylake the call tree is incorrect

2022-07-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29015 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle do

[Bug gprofng/29353] [display html] Fix a lay-out issue in the html disassembly files

2022-07-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29353 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle do

[Bug gprofng/29352] [display html] Fix the message Hexadecimal number > 0xffffffff non-portable

2022-07-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29352 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle do

[Bug gprofng/29351] [display html] Move dynamic loading of modules to a later stage

2022-07-11 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29351 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.39 Assignee|vladimir.m

[Bug ld/29355] New: ld segfaults with -r/-q and custom-named section .rela*

2022-07-11 Thread samuel.hym+bugs at rustyne dot lautre.net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29355 Bug ID: 29355 Summary: ld segfaults with -r/-q and custom-named section .rela* Product: binutils Version: 2.38 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gas/29349] ADR instructions generate wrong offsets in Thumb code for armv7-m

2022-07-11 Thread Mr.Bossman075 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29349 --- Comment #4 from Jesse Taube --- I'm sure when I tested it, that commit broke u-boot. It seems like there are two bugs causing the same problem. The way U-boot has it written is like bugB notice the `type` is after. Which does seem to chang

[Bug gas/29349] ADR instructions generate wrong offsets in Thumb code for armv7-m

2022-07-11 Thread Mr.Bossman075 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29349 --- Comment #2 from Jesse Taube --- it changes when the type is set to function before vs after. In U-Boot and Linux it is set after so I kept it the same. https://godbolt.org/z/hncMz7rb6 I checked against llvm and they are always 4. -- Y

[Bug gas/29349] ADR instructions generate wrong offsets in Thumb code for armv7-m

2022-07-11 Thread tnfchris at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29349 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-07-11 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gas/29349] ADR instructions generate wrong offsets in Thumb code for armv7-m

2022-07-11 Thread tnfchris at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29349 --- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Jesse Taube from comment #0) > In U-Boot after this commit, armv7-m fails to boot because of this commit. > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit; > h=d3e52e120b68bf1955274