[Bug ld/29072] ld silently make the program stack area executable if nested function is used

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29072 --- Comment #20 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=16538271c82db0ba5679344c4107564b70a756a1 commit 16538271c82db0ba5679344c4107

[Bug ld/29086] -Wl,--wrap=foo with LTO leads to undefined symbol

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29086 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 14084 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14084&action=edit A patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29087] "non-canonical reference to canonical protected function" with protected visibility, -mno-direct-extern-access and virtual functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29087 --- Comment #5 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > Created attachment 14083 [details] > The v2 patch All of Qt still builds fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29072] ld silently make the program stack area executable if nested function is used

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29072 --- Comment #18 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17) > What should we do about failing nested function tests in GCC testsuite? Well I believe that Jeff Law is looking into this situation. But in general I would say t

[Bug ld/29072] ld silently make the program stack area executable if nested function is used

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29072 --- Comment #19 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f93c6e0a2ed1ad4f0a9bb8f38e859f3312c25282 commit f93c6e0a2ed1ad4f0a9bb8f38e859f3

[Bug ld/29072] ld silently make the program stack area executable if nested function is used

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29072 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #16) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > > Is the goal to remove nested functions? > > No - the goal is to improve the security of programs by letting their > buil

[Bug ld/29087] "non-canonical reference to canonical protected function" with protected visibility, -mno-direct-extern-access and virtual functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29087 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14079|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/29006] alloc(): invalid size (unsorted) with -fstack-protector -lssp

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29006 --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani --- Hi Nick, sorry for the late reply, I missed your comment! Just applied to mingw-binutils in Fedora and mingw-llvm is now building fine, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC lis

[Bug ld/29072] ld silently make the program stack area executable if nested function is used

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29072 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---