https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13964|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
--- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira ---
That is, this patch brings BFD ld on par with Gold. The remaining issue for
Gold is #28876.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Created attachment 13964 [details]
> A patch
>
> Try this.
Confirmed for copy relocations:
$ cat main.cpp
extern __attribute__((visibility("default"))) long int
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 40956 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_ranlib_simulation:
Direct-leak in bfd_malloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40956#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> I need to think about this a bit. The object file is arguably buggy in that
> it says that it uses hw fp, but doesn't say which version. But if we report
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
Bug ID: 28879
Summary: [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect
"undefined reference" errors
Product: binutils
Version: 2.39 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6)
> Fair enough. The thing that worries me is that the problematic file -
> crti.o - comes from glibc and is going to affect the building of a lot of
> project
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> Created attachment 13968 [details]
> Proposed Patch
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> How about this patch ?
>
> I was unsure what should be done with the other pot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 13968
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13968&action=edit
Proposed Patch
Hi Richard,
How about this patch ?
I was unsure what should be done with the other po
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||plugwash at p10link dot net
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28859
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28866
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28878
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Faulls ---
Created attachment 13966
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13966&action=edit
myfunc.c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28878
--- Comment #3 from Joseph Faulls ---
Created attachment 13967
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13967&action=edit
main.c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28878
--- Comment #1 from Joseph Faulls ---
Created attachment 13965
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13965&action=edit
myfunc.s
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28878
Bug ID: 28878
Summary: [RISCV] Incorrect DW_AT_high_pc for assembly source
with linker relaxation
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
16 matches
Mail list logo
