[Bug binutils/28420] segv in objdump at disassemble_bytes objdump.c:3059

2021-10-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28420 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Last re

[Bug binutils/28419] global-buffer-overflow in objdump at objdump.c:3054

2021-10-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28419 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/28403] segv in objdump at disassemble_bytes (objdump.c:3055)

2021-10-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28403 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 28419 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/28403] segv in objdump at disassemble_bytes (objdump.c:3055)

2021-10-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28403 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/28402] fail to allocate error in objdump at objalloc.c:143

2021-10-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28402 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/28401] fail to allocate error in objdump at xmalloc.c:147

2021-10-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28401 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/28403] segv in objdump at disassemble_bytes (objdump.c:3055)

2021-10-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28403 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0a6041ce9383338fa62acb207683780faaa8b42c commit 0a6041ce9383338fa62acb2076837

[Bug binutils/28401] fail to allocate error in objdump at xmalloc.c:147

2021-10-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28401 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=55e3926e79937da55da3eaad3b15b4c099071976 commit 55e3926e79937da55da3eaad3b15b

[Bug binutils/28423] New: use-after-free in objdump at disassemble_bytes objdump.c:3059

2021-10-05 Thread irfanariq at kaist dot ac.kr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28423 Bug ID: 28423 Summary: use-after-free in objdump at disassemble_bytes objdump.c:3059 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug binutils/28421] New: SEGV in objdump at dump_reloc_set objdump.c:4636

2021-10-05 Thread irfanariq at kaist dot ac.kr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421 Bug ID: 28421 Summary: SEGV in objdump at dump_reloc_set objdump.c:4636 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug ld/28399] Flag to order functions in a specific order based on order file

2021-10-05 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28399 --- Comment #3 from hiraditya --- Here is an example of order file that is used to build clang itself. https://opensource.apple.com/source/clang/clang-211.10.1/clang.order.auto.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug ld/28399] Flag to order functions in a specific order based on order file

2021-10-05 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28399 --- Comment #2 from hiraditya --- > the format of the file it is a text file with line separated (mangled) symbol name. > nor what happens to symbols that are not in the file IIUC symbols that are in the file get preference over all other sym

[Bug binutils/28422] New: use-after-free in objdump at get_build_id (./bfd/opncls.c:1864)

2021-10-05 Thread irfanariq at kaist dot ac.kr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28422 Bug ID: 28422 Summary: use-after-free in objdump at get_build_id (./bfd/opncls.c:1864) Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug binutils/28419] New: global-buffer-overflow in objdump at objdump.c:3054

2021-10-05 Thread irfanariq at kaist dot ac.kr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28419 Bug ID: 28419 Summary: global-buffer-overflow in objdump at objdump.c:3054 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/28420] New: segv in objdump at disassemble_bytes objdump.c:3059

2021-10-05 Thread irfanariq at kaist dot ac.kr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28420 Bug ID: 28420 Summary: segv in objdump at disassemble_bytes objdump.c:3059 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug ld/28399] Flag to order functions in a specific order based on order file

2021-10-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28399 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gold/28417] std::string no longer allows accepting nullptr_t since it is undefined behavior after yesterday's change on libstdc++.

2021-10-05 Thread jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, the patch is correct. To construct an empty string either use "" as the initializer, or just use the default constructor. Creating a string from NULL or nullptr is completely bogus and has been und