https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 13701
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13701&action=edit
another NULL undefined behavior bug fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
Here is another problem.
../../../../binutils-gdb/gold/incremental.cc:2289:12: error: use of deleted
function 'std::__cxx11::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits,
_Alloc>::basic_string(std::nullptr_t) [with _CharT = ch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 13700
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13700&action=edit
just remove name_(NULL),
Simple but correct patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
Bug ID: 28417
Summary: std::string no longer allows accepting nullptr_t since
it is undefined behavior after yesterday's change on
libstdc++.
Product: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28410
--- Comment #5 from Nelson Chu ---
Oh, sorry for the wrong description, we should update the tables in the
_bfd_riscv_relax_section, rather than the tables in the
riscv_elf_relocate_section. Otherwise, the idea should be similar.
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28410
--- Comment #4 from Nelson Chu ---
> I had thought about a possible approach to rewrite the commit, such that we
> can restart the relaxation process again without modifying the `again`
> pointer. Perhaps its worth me working on this if that's
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 12:20:15PM +0800, lhq...@126.com wrote:
> This is t_.s: (assemble code after CPP)
> # 0 "t.s"
I don't see how the above first line of the file would produce the
results you see, or be fixed by your patch. It seems likely to me
that you have some sort of binutils build prob
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 35826 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Timeout in
fuzz_readelf
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35826#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It has been
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28415
Bug ID: 28415
Summary: stack-buffer-overflow in objdump at disassemble_bytes
(objdump.c:2905)
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28416
Bug ID: 28416
Summary: SEGV in objdump at bfd_getl32 (bfd/libbfd.c:727)
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28410
lewis.revill at embecosm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lewis.revill at embe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28414
Bug ID: 28414
Summary: SEGV in objdump at bfd/reloc.c:8423
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
13 matches
Mail list logo
