https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28262
Bug ID: 28262
Summary: Add warning when generating code in data section
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26822
ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryancoop987 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
--- Comment #10 from Dietmar May ---
>> Consider a stub of code that is intended to be copied somewhere else before
>> it is executed
That seems like the exception, rather than the rule. In that situation, the
section can be explicitly marked
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab ---
"If no flags are specified, the default flags depend upon the section
name. If the section name is not recognized, the default will be for
the section to have none of the above flags: it will not be allo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
--- Comment #7 from Dietmar May ---
OK. From the AS manual:
"If no flags are specified, the default flags depend upon the section name. If
the section name is not recognized, the default will be for the section to be
loaded and writable."
We
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Summary|gas 2.63.1 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
--- Comment #5 from Dietmar May ---
No, I trust that it works.
The PR states:
>> DW_AT_ranges (since DWARF v3; probably ok to have it in -gdwarf-2) probably
>> should not have contribution from non-executable sections.
But this is NOT a non
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
--- Comment #4 from Luis Machado ---
Did you try Alan's proposed solution of marking the section with "ax". Or is
there a reason why the section shouldn't be marked as such?
For the record, this isn't really a GDB bug, but a change in behavio
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
Dietmar May changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28169
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ee077885e5d182d0d9fba090f3505f16f640dff7
commit ee077885e5d182d0d9fba090f3505
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
12 matches
Mail list logo