[Bug binutils/27793] [nm] segv in bfd.h:1233

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27793 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Ahcheong, Thanks for reporting this bug. I have checked in a patch to test for the NULL pointer, and to prevent such a pointer being assigned in the first place. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving

[Bug binutils/27793] [nm] segv in bfd.h:1233

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27793 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=09e40e44ad05822ed72f6ad720b5e75ea2a8fc67 commit 09e40e44ad05822ed72f6ad720b

[Bug binutils/27793] [nm] segv in bfd.h:1233

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27793 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com Ever confi

[Bug binutils/27792] [nm] heap buffer overflow found in bfd/som.c:4805

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27792 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/27792] [nm] heap buffer overflow found in bfd/som.c:4805

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27792 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=063e75c9e4307d21b787a71b6d5b61a2560f5073 commit 063e75c9e4307d21b787a71b6d5

[Bug binutils/27792] [nm] heap buffer overflow found in bfd/som.c:4805

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27792 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com

[Bug binutils/27801] New: [size] heap-buffer-overflow on bfd/mach-o.c:5934

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27801 Bug ID: 27801 Summary: [size] heap-buffer-overflow on bfd/mach-o.c:5934 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/27800] New: [size] heap-buffer-overflow on bfd/archive.c:667

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27800 Bug ID: 27800 Summary: [size] heap-buffer-overflow on bfd/archive.c:667 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/27799] New: [size] heap-buffer-overflow on bfd/libbfd.c:548

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27799 Bug ID: 27799 Summary: [size] heap-buffer-overflow on bfd/libbfd.c:548 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/27798] New: [size] heap-buffer-overflow on bfd/coff-rs6000.c:1699

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27798 Bug ID: 27798 Summary: [size] heap-buffer-overflow on bfd/coff-rs6000.c:1699 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 --- Comment #2 from Ahcheong Lee --- Sorry about the wrong comment The crashed stack trace is ==14202==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: attempting double-free on 0x61900580 in thread T0: #0 0x5d809d in free (.../afl++/subjects_friend/size/si

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 --- Comment #1 from Ahcheong Lee --- Created attachment 13409 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13409&action=edit crash test case -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27797] New: [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 Bug ID: 27797 Summary: [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/27796] New: [readelf] Attempting free on wrong address in binutils/dwarf.c:11590

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27796 Bug ID: 27796 Summary: [readelf] Attempting free on wrong address in binutils/dwarf.c:11590 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug binutils/27795] New: [nm] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd/coff-rs6000.c:1699

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27795 Bug ID: 27795 Summary: [nm] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd/coff-rs6000.c:1699 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/27794] New: [nm] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd.c:2389

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27794 Bug ID: 27794 Summary: [nm] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd.c:2389 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

[Bug binutils/27793] New: [nm] segv in bfd.h:1233

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27793 Bug ID: 27793 Summary: [nm] segv in bfd.h:1233 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/27792] New: [nm] heap buffer overflow found in bfd/som.c:4805

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27792 Bug ID: 27792 Summary: [nm] heap buffer overflow found in bfd/som.c:4805 Product: binutils Version: 2.37 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/27594] build processes broken by changed space handling

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27594 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Wolff --- Unfortunately the patch doesn't fix the issue, as it only decides how to handle the whole string but does not break at that position. Also please note Johannes' suggestion to prefer a more state-of-the-art

[Bug binutils/27594] build processes broken by changed space handling

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27594 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug binutils/27594] build processes broken by changed space handling

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27594 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5edb8e3f5ad8d74a83fc0df7f6e4514eed0aa77f commit 5edb8e3f5ad8d74a83fc0df7f6e

[Bug binutils/27594] build processes broken by changed space handling

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27594 Martin Storsjö changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin at martin dot st --- Comment

[Bug ld/27180] RISC-V far relocations for auipc instructions may cause segfault with --emit-relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27180 --- Comment #2 from Nelson Chu --- Hi Julius, Thanks for reporting this. Your assumption is correct, the PCREL relocs are converted to the directly access relocs, but we don't update them to the relocation table, so we will get segment fault

[Bug ld/27180] RISC-V far relocations for auipc instructions may cause segfault with --emit-relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27180 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13402|application/mbox|text/plain mime type|

[Bug ld/27180] RISC-V far relocations for auipc instructions may cause segfault with --emit-relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27180 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org --- C