[Bug binutils/27751] test failure on powerpc-linux-gnu

2021-04-20 Thread efraim at flashner dot co.il
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751 --- Comment #8 from Efraim Flashner --- On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:38:48PM +, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > (In reply to Efraim Flashner from comment #4) > > > CPU: 7447A (1) @ 1.420GHz > > So, a 32-bit powerpc. Maybe this is a 32-bi

[Bug binutils/27759] New: heap-buffer-overflow in srec_read_section

2021-04-20 Thread rubycccccccccc at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27759 Bug ID: 27759 Summary: heap-buffer-overflow in srec_read_section Product: binutils Version: 2.36.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

[Bug binutils/27751] test failure on powerpc-linux-gnu

2021-04-20 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- This is obvious: static void demangle_const_char (struct rust_demangler *rdm) { size_t hex_len; uint64_t value; // else if (value > ' ' && value < '~') /* Rust also considers many non-AS

[Bug binutils/27751] test failure on powerpc-linux-gnu

2021-04-20 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- It's most likely an endian bug. The same failure happens on ppc, ppc64, s390x, m68k. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27751] test failure on powerpc-linux-gnu

2021-04-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Efraim Flashner from comment #4) > CPU: 7447A (1) @ 1.420GHz So, a 32-bit powerpc. Maybe this is a 32-bit vs 64-bit problem. Do you have access to any other type of machine that you could

[Bug binutils/27751] test failure on powerpc-linux-gnu

2021-04-20 Thread efraim at flashner dot co.il
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751 --- Comment #4 from Efraim Flashner --- On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:55:47PM +, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > I tried the same using Fedora's gcc-10.2.1-9.fc32.x86_64: > > % make check > make[1]: Entering directory '/dev/shm/delme/bu

[Bug binutils/27751] test failure on powerpc-linux-gnu

2021-04-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Efraim Flashner from comment #2) Hi Efraim, > I then downloaded a fresh copy of binutils-2.36.1 and ran the test suite > for libiberty there using Debian's gcc-10.2.1. > > (ins)efraim@g4:~/wo

[Bug gas/21700] powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0 fails with unresolved symbols

2021-04-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21700 --- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c5df7e442e6cdc9303b7373842370d6ee8f67ea5 commit c5df7e442e6cdc9303b7373842

[Bug gas/27753] -mx86-used-note= defaulting to yes regresses

2021-04-20 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27753 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/27753] -mx86-used-note= defaulting to yes regresses

2021-04-20 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27753 --- Comment #2 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > It sounds like .note.gnu.property section is unused. Please pass > -R .note.gnu.property to objcopy to remove it. That's what I'm meaning to do as a workaround, but