[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2021-04-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 --- Comment #23 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to John Dong from comment #22) > Hi, can we backport this patch to binutils-2_34-branch ? You can of course do what you like with your own copy of binutils, but I don't consider this series of pat

[Bug ld/27722] ld/libdep_plugin.c:142:19: error: array subscript has type ‘char’ [-Werror=char-subscripts]

2021-04-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27722 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1cfc6f00e45104551da9146bb413b60acd0e387f commit 1cfc6f00e45104551da9146bb413b

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2021-04-12 Thread dongjianqiang2 at huawei dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 John Dong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dongjianqiang2 at huawei dot com --- Com

[Bug ld/27722] New: ld/libdep_plugin.c:142:19: error: array subscript has type ‘char’ [-Werror=char-subscripts]

2021-04-12 Thread sdanyyil at yahoo dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27722 Bug ID: 27722 Summary: ld/libdep_plugin.c:142:19: error: array subscript has type ‘char’ [-Werror=char-subscripts] Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCON

[Bug libctf/27360] libctf.so.0: undefined symbol: bsearch_r

2021-04-12 Thread toolybird at tuta dot io
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27360 --- Comment #16 from Toolybird --- $ grep "/usr/lib " libctf/config.status sys_lib_search_path_spec='/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/10.2.0 /usr/lib /lib ' sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec='/lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/libfakeroot ' That looks fairly n

[Bug libctf/27360] libctf.so.0: undefined symbol: bsearch_r

2021-04-12 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27360 --- Comment #15 from Nick Alcock --- The real question is where the -L/usr/lib is coming from. If you dig into config.status it should become clear. I bet this is derived from some .la file somewhere, so that libtool thinks it needs -L/usr/lib