https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27500
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.37
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27493
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27493
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fd5c076a06d88dc53e56a17d43ea4ad5e27515a0
commit fd5c076a06d88dc53e56a17d43ea4
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27500
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5789f845fbf67d271e0f5ff154eb03319b551211
commit 5789f845fbf67d271e0f5ff154eb0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27495
--- Comment #9 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #7)
> >
> > It is true that --start-stop-gc may break linking with current static glibc,
> > a fact that limits --start-stop-gc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27505
Bug ID: 27505
Summary: Mr-yycis
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assigne
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27503
Bug ID: 27503
Summary: Mr-yycis
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assigne
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27495
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #7)
>
> It is true that --start-stop-gc may break linking with current static glibc,
> a fact that limits --start-stop-gc usefulness.
>
> BTW, this testcase also shows an i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27500
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27500
Bug ID: 27500
Summary: --gc-sections with groups and start/stop syms
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Componen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27495
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-z start_stop_gc isn't |-z start_stop_gc isn't
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27495
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > So this option generates broken outputs by design.
> Not at all. The option turns off some linker garbage collection magic in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27495
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> So this option generates broken outputs by design.
Not at all. The option turns off some linker garbage collection magic in cases
where you do not want that magic. Sa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #3)
>
> I don't know what happened to the 2010-01 patch. It likely did not let
> __start_ reference retain magic sections in other translation unit (in
> metadata section u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> -z start-stop-gc is a bad idea. LLVM should use __gc_start/__gc_stop.
I think the history is:
* In 2006-10, [BZ3400](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27482
Nick Alcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Nick Alcock
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27482
Nick Alcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
Hi Libor,
Unfortunately the above code does not work for the following reasons:
- sections are already created in that point of code
- symbol filtering requires output sections to be created
- cannot find bfd_remove_section function that could handle it
However, this code removes the section
Hi Libor,
Patch approved - please apply.
thank you for your approval. How can I obtain a write permission to binutils
repository?
Ah right. First of all do you have a FSF Copyright assignment for the binutils
?
I assume, based upon your email address, that you are working for Oracle and
t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27484
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27484
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ca8f6bc629cb27792ce449e7253c74a3f6f75fda
commit ca8f6bc629cb27792ce449e7253
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27484
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||27495
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27495
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||27491
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Stat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27478
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
1.gz and 3.gz produced like this:
...
$ gcc ~/hello.c -g
$ cp a.out 1; cp 1 2; ./dwz -m 3 1 2
...
Reproduce:
...
$ readelf --string-dump=.gnu_debugaltlink 1
1: Found separate debug info file: 3
String du
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27478
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 13275
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13275&action=edit
3.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27478
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 13274
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13274&action=edit
1.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27478
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2)
> It didn't.
Hmmm. Please could you upload the tmp.multfile.sh/1 file ?
And the "3" file as well. (If I am reading the description correctly).
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27451
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b80e421f9136117389be9d96210b35b3d562d725
commit b80e421f9136117389be9d96210b3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27484
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
Comment on attachment 13273
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13273
object file - ICC
That does look like the same issue. It also generates an DW_AT_specification
with a forward refe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27484
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liska ---
Created attachment 13273
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13273&action=edit
object file - ICC
Apparently, ICC built object file suffers from the same.
--
You are receiving this mai
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
34 matches
Mail list logo
