https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
--- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 13270
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13270&action=edit
hello.o.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 13269
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13269&action=edit
hello.s
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27128
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27128
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 13268
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13268&action=edit
Add nm --without-symbol-versions
There wasn't one to turn off symbol versions. After df2c87b58037 for pr207
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
Hannes Domani changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27407
--- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song ---
Yes, response files are accepted by many llvm-project tools. You reminded me
that we can compose tools, e.g.
ld.bfd @response.txt $(nm -Du usr/lib64/libc.so.6 | awk '{print
"-y"substr($0,20)}')
For object
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26659
Hannes Domani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27408
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Fangrui Song :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7fe1b1388ff80f10e932cde5d82d7268742ef336
commit 7fe1b1388ff80f10e932cde5d82
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27411
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fe0171d248e6d4cbc59c3101b9e74e18a9292294
commit fe0171d248e6d4cbc59c3101b9e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27411
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27215
--- Comment #6 from Jim Wilson ---
There is a problem if at least one label is in the text section. So yes, we
could support this for debug info sections. On the compiler side, there is no
way currently to tell the compiler that uleb128 is O
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27408
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27407
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7)
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6)
>
> > Quick question: do you know where I can find the definition of the
> > contents of a .debug_macro.dwo section i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6)
> Quick question: do you know where I can find the definition of the
> contents of a .debug_macro.dwo section in the DWARF standard ?
Naturally as soon as I p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Tom,
> No problem :) , done.
Thanks. Quick question: do you know where I can find the definition of the
contents of a .debug_macro.dwo section in the DWARF standard ? I have looked
and found various
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27128
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6)
>
> That said, pr25708 also had a request for a way to turn off reporting
> versions, and at one stage nm had an option to conditionally display version
> info. H.J., w
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27390
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27390
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=32e4f96ceca798ad21f344e96667de9161c0b857
commit 32e4f96ceca798ad21f344e9666
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27128
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
@@ and @ have different meanings in symbol definitions. sym@@ver specifies a
definition of sym that satifies references to plain sym as well as sym@ver.
sym@ver2 in a definition only satifies references to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27128
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> Would you mind uploading the a.out and hello.dwo files please ?
>
> (I am not sure if the gcc that have installed here will produce
> the same results as
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 13266
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13266&action=edit
a.out.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 13267
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13267&action=edit
hello.dwo.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27428
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-linux
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27215
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Any reason why at least for now you can't add partial .{s,u}leb128 support?
I.e. support non-constant .{s,u}leb128 in .debug* sections as long as it refers
to .debug* section labels and not to code section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27215
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Cross-referencing gcc PR https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27215
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27387
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27473
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27456
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.37
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27473
Bug ID: 27473
Summary: it's report error when using uftrace from
binutils2.35.1
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
33 matches
Mail list logo
