[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to

2021-02-21 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #11 from Kilian Kegel --- Hi H.J. regrettably, your fix does not help at all. I have uploaded the diff views "ineffective bugbatch from 2021-02-18 18:23" as a ZIP archive if you want to review. But I have found, that in the "or

[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to

2021-02-21 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #10 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13246 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13246&action=edit bugfix27432 binutils 2.36.1 ld - on the right side, left side manually corrected version -- You are rece

[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to

2021-02-21 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #9 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13245 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13245&action=edit original binutils 2.36.1 ld - on the right side, left side manually corrected version -- You are receivin

[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to

2021-02-21 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #8 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13244 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13244&action=edit bugfix27171 binutils 2.35 ld - on the right side, left side manually corrected version -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to

2021-02-21 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #7 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13243 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13243&action=edit bugfix26583 binutils 2.35 ld - on the right side, left side manually corrected version -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to

2021-02-21 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #6 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13242 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13242&action=edit original binutils 2.35 ld - on the right side, left side manually corrected version -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to

2021-02-21 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #5 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13241 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13241&action=edit original binutils 2.34 ld - on the right side, left side manually corrected version -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to

2021-02-21 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #4 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13240 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13240&action=edit ineffective bugbatch from 2021-02-18 18:23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug ld/24685] [RISCV] R_RISCV_CALL_PLT should not create a canonical PLT in -no-pie mode

2021-02-21 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/27158] RISC-V port still has UJ instruction type references

2021-02-21 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/27452] New: ld: Support compressing arbitrary sections (generalized --compress-debug-sections=)

2021-02-21 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27452 Bug ID: 27452 Summary: ld: Support compressing arbitrary sections (generalized --compress-debug-sections=) Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/27451] New: ld: Provide a way to make C identifier name sections GCable under __start_/__stop_ references

2021-02-21 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27451 Bug ID: 27451 Summary: ld: Provide a way to make C identifier name sections GCable under __start_/__stop_ references Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNC

[Bug binutils/27447] readelf does not support DWARF 5 forms

2021-02-21 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27447 --- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey --- Also I don't see a way to dump the contents of .debug_sup. This is the standardized equivalent of the GNU alt debuglink section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Issue 31168 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Timeout in fuzz_readelf

2021-02-21 Thread p . ant… via monorail
Comment #3 on issue 31168 by p.ant...@catenacyber.fr: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Timeout in fuzz_readelf https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=31168#c3 > Perhaps the readelf tests ought to redirect output to /dev/null? Alan, do you know how to do that ? -- You received this messag