https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171
--- Comment #4 from Kilian Kegel ---
Created attachment 13115
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13115&action=edit
screen shot
Hi H.J.
please find the appended screen shot.
This patch works - perfect.
Thanks a lot,
Kil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.37
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766
--- Comment #24 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=44124a46839b3563e448edfd013c6faa6a8b1642
commit 44124a46839b3563e448edfd013c6fa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=83b33c6cb90db6c110bff0d5024713e8af747005
commit 83b33c6cb90db6c110bff0d5024713e8
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=03c02f3116d75721f917c4155cefb18b940a43ff
commit 03c02f3116d75721f917c4155cefb18b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|amodra at gmail dot com|hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Patches are posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-January/114879.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|R_X86_64_PC32 static|R_AMD64_DIR64/R_AMD64_DIR32
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 13114
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13114&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liska from comment #22)
> Kudos H.J.
> Can we close this as resolved?
--enable-pgo-build=lto fails with binutils 2.30 since ar in binutils 2.30
doesn't support
$ ar --plugin /usr/libexec/g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171
Kilian Kegel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171
Kilian Kegel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.35.1 |2.37 (HEAD)
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_36-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dee726de9b1b5e6eaa1d1869c68d8e443646e72a
commit dee726de9b1b5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c0f6e439cc59fa60fec3a4c4ff56e6fac52a8c65
commit c0f6e439cc59fa60fec3a4c4ff5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167
--- Comment #5 from Matt Jenkins ---
Sure thing. I've retained the -mips5 flag which GCC doesn't seem to use, just
in case there's some other source that flag could come from. It's doing no harm
being there.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167
--- Comment #4 from Matt Jenkins ---
Created attachment 13113
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13113&action=edit
Patch for mips flags
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27155
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Comment #1 on issue 29483 by amo...@gmail.com: binutils: Fuzzing build failure
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=29483#c1
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
--
You received this message because:
1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue
You may adj
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
PR13256
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.36|2.37 (HEAD)
--
You are receiving this m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173
Bug ID: 27173
Summary: binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167
--- Comment #2 from Matt Jenkins ---
Actually, there's a couple more missing. From GCC's `--target-help`:
Known MIPS ISA levels (for use with the -mips option):
1 2 3 32 32r2 32r3 32r5 32r6 4 64 64r2 64r3 64r5 64r6
-mips64r3 and -mips
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167
--- Comment #1 from Matt Jenkins ---
On further investigation there is no MIPS32R4, so the -mips32r4 flag could be
removed from that list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Comment #4 on issue 27734 by amo...@gmail.com: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Abrt with
empty stacktrace
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=27734#c4
Pull request here https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/4945
--
You received this message because:
1. You were specifically CC'd o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766
--- Comment #22 from Martin Liska ---
Kudos H.J.
Can we close this as resolved?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Comment #3 on issue 27734 by p.ant...@catenacyber.fr: binutils:fuzz_readelf:
Abrt with empty stacktrace
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=27734#c3
Thanks Alan, could you push this patch upstream ?
--
You received this message because:
1. You were specifically CC'd on the
31 matches
Mail list logo
