[Bug ld/26256] Support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER & non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components in an output section

2020-12-21 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 --- Comment #13 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #10) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > > > Created attachment 13070 [details] > > > A patch with tests > > > > > >

[Bug ld/26256] Support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER & non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components in an output section

2020-12-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #10) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > > Created attachment 13070 [details] > > A patch with tests > > > > Try this. > > With a minor change, it'll match LLD (I

[Bug ld/26256] Support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER & non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components in an output section

2020-12-21 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 --- Comment #11 from Fangrui Song --- About -r & SHF_LINK_ORDER. The LLD resolution is that SHF_LINK_ORDER sections of the same name should not be combined. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/lld/test/ELF/linkerscript/linkorder-li

[Bug ld/26256] Support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER & non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components in an output section

2020-12-21 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 --- Comment #10 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > Created attachment 13070 [details] > A patch with tests > > Try this. With a minor change, it'll match LLD (I place ordered sections before unordered sections beca

[Bug ld/26256] Support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER & non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components in an output section

2020-12-21 Thread hkrzesin at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 Herton R. Krzesinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hkrzesin at redhat dot com ---

[Bug gas/27102] New: gas: "section symbols are already global" -> should be local

2020-12-21 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27102 Bug ID: 27102 Summary: gas: "section symbols are already global" -> should be local Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug admin/27095] Hai

2020-12-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27095 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- The content of attachment 13062 has been deleted for the following reason: spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.