https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #16 from Mike Lothian ---
Looks good here
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #15 from Mike Lothian ---
I can confirm that that patch on top of 2.35.1 gets things working on 32bit
mingw
I'll test 64bit and regular Linux builds later this evening
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26678
Bug ID: 26678
Summary: construction vtable defined in a discarded section
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #13 from Mike Lothian ---
I'm not sure how to shrink the issue to a test case, but will happily test out
any patches on x86 x86_64 on native Linux and Mingw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:02 AM Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> Hi H.J., Hi Fanguri,
>
> Would you mind having a look at:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
> This bug appears to be happenin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi H.J., Hi Fanguri,
Would you mind having a look at:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
This bug appears to be happening as a result of the fix for
PR 26262:
https://sourceware
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #10 from Mike Lothian ---
Equally reverting 041d1c2d4f03a134cb7574e4d62d2ce4418503ff from binutils-2_35_1
allows things to build again
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #9 from Mike Lothian ---
041d1c2d4f03a134cb7574e4d62d2ce4418503ff is the first bad commit
commit 041d1c2d4f03a134cb7574e4d62d2ce4418503ff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #8 from Mike Lothian ---
Hi, not sure if I'll be able to make a test case. I have bisected between 2.34
and 2.35.1 and found this to be the bad commit:
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jul 22 03:49:07 2020 -0700
ld: Properly over
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Mike Lothian from comment #6)
Hi Mike,
OK, so just to recap, the build works if:
* binutils 2.34 is used or
* LTO is not enabled or
* The build is for 64-bit x86_64
So much for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #6 from Mike Lothian ---
Hi Nick
Yes it builds without LTO with bintuils 2.35.1
I'm using GCC 10.2, the version of GCC hasn't changed, it continues to build
just fine with LTO and binutils 2.34 if I downgrade
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Mike,
I have a feeling that this is an LTO issue:
libstdc++.a(eh_alloc.o):eh_alloc.cc:
(.rdata$_ZTSSt9exception[__ZTSSt9exception]+0x0):
multiple definition of `typeinfo name for std::exc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #4 from Mike Lothian ---
I also rebuilt gcc with the batched bintuils, but the same still happens
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #3 from Mike Lothian ---
Created attachment 12870
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12870&action=edit
updated build.log
The DWARF messages have now gone, but the build still fails
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
16 matches
Mail list logo
