https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26378
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 12844
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12844&action=edit
dubious fix
We could change the default for sections with input only from linker scripts,
but that will alm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26623
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26623
Bug ID: 26623
Summary: buffer overflow in ppc_symbol_is_valid
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26622
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
Ah, I alias `re` to readelf and `G` to `| grep` :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26622
Bug ID: 26622
Summary: Support --gc-sections for SHF_MERGE sections
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26583
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
(In r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26583
--- Comment #14 from Kilian Kegel ---
Hi H.J.Lu,
no it works! That is great! ;-)
Your implementation resolves all of the bugs (2)
that I noticed so far 26583, 26584 and 26547 (.BSS and OPTIMIZATION bug).
So I will continue my project soon:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26610
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26610
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7e30b1ebbf2fcf5e6bcfc3a7791d9a52614dcc43
commit 7e30b1ebbf2fcf5e6bcfc3a7791d9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26610
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-15
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26610
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> I didn't see any regression on arm when I made the patch. Maybe this
> problem
> needs a 32-bit host?
Possibly. I assume you tested armv7l, would you please
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26610
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
I didn't see any regression on arm when I made the patch. Maybe this problem
needs a 32-bit host?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 matches
Mail list logo