[Bug ld/16833] ld refuses to mix ordered and unordered sections

2020-07-16 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16833 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug ld/26256] Support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER & non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components in an output section

2020-07-16 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 --- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song --- The last case has the same section content as the previous one: ## Non-contiguous SHF_LINK_ORDER sections, separated by a symbol assignment. # RUN: echo 'SECTIONS { .rodata : {*(.rodata.foo) a = .; *(.

[Bug ld/26256] New: Support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER & non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components in an output section

2020-07-16 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 Bug ID: 26256 Summary: Support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER & non-SHF_LINK_ORDER components in an output section Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/26251] An error in bfd_malloc

2020-07-16 Thread 15664243668 at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26251 --- Comment #2 from 15664243668 at 163 dot com --- Created attachment 12706 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12706&action=edit PoC This is the PoC file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list fo

[Bug gas/26253] New: Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0

2020-07-16 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 Bug ID: 26253 Summary: Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Componen

[Bug binutils/26251] An error in bfd_malloc

2020-07-16 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26251 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/26250] An error in bfd_malloc

2020-07-16 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26250 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/26198] Failure to merge read only data of machine code object file and LTO object file on MinGW

2020-07-16 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26198 Markus Böck changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/26246] invalid access in bfd/elf32-xtensa.c

2020-07-16 Thread msebor at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26246 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, I've verified it also silences the warning and is correct since the key is [required to be] the first argument to the comparison function. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC li

[Bug binutils/26251] New: An error in bfd_malloc

2020-07-16 Thread 15664243668 at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26251 Bug ID: 26251 Summary: An error in bfd_malloc Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/26250] New: An error in bfd_malloc

2020-07-16 Thread 15664243668 at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26250 Bug ID: 26250 Summary: An error in bfd_malloc Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/26244] An error in _objalloc_alloc

2020-07-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26244 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|